CTA studyDiagnostics2025Open Access

Origin variants of the ascending pharyngeal artery

A bilateral CTA study of 170 carotid axes that separates the origin of the ascending pharyngeal artery from the complete sequential branching pattern of the external carotid artery.

Rodica Narcisa Calotă · Alexandra Diana Vrapciu · Sorin Hostiuc · Marius Ioan Rusu · Răzvan Costin Tudose · Mihail Silviu Tudosie · George Triantafyllou · Maria Piagkou · Mugurel Constantin Rusu
The central finding

There is no single “usual” APA origin pattern that safely predicts the opposite side.

Type II—origin from the posterior wall of the external carotid artery—was most common, but six origin states and 40 sequential ECA branching types were documented. Side and sex did not produce statistically significant overall pattern differences.

40distinct sequential ECA branching types
01 · Cohort

One patient, two carotid axes

Bilateral CTA makes the study especially useful for procedural anatomy because the right and left sides were evaluated as paired vascular systems rather than isolated arteries.

85

Patients

54 men and 31 women.

170

Carotid axes

Both sides assessed in every patient.

69 ± 10

Mean age

Years in the analysed cohort.

6

Origin states

Type 0 plus Types I–V.

02 · Prevalence

The six origin states

Percentages refer to all 170 carotid axes and explain why the Type II posterior-wall origin cannot be treated as a safe universal template.

Type 0 · absent
14.71%
Type I · ECA medial
26.47%
Type II · ECA posterior
35.88%
Type III · OPT
17.06%
Type IV · ICA
4.71%
Type V · other
1.18%
03 · Bilateral anatomy

Asymmetry is common enough to matter

The most frequent bilateral combination was Type I on the right with Type II on the left (19 of 85 patients; 22.35%). Seventeen different right–left combinations were identified.

22.35%

I–II combination

Most frequent paired pattern: right ECA-medial and left ECA-posterior.

12.94%

0–0 combination

APA absent bilaterally in 11 of 85 patients.

71.76%

Suprahyoid origin

Overall frequency of the suprahyoid origin level among all sides.

Procedural implication: the absence of predictable side- or sex-related patterns supports bilateral pre-procedural imaging when the APA, occipitopharyngeal trunk, or the full ECA branching order matters.
04 · Reproduced diagrams

Paper diagrams used directly

This version now includes a locally bundled diagram set based on the article’s diagrammatic figures, with all three figures displayed at equal width and one per row.

Figure 4. Anatomical diagram used to represent the sequence types of the origin of the ascending pharyngeal artery from the external carotid artery.
Figure 4. Anatomical diagram used to represent the types of sequence of the origin of the ascending pharyngeal artery from the external carotid artery. Locally bundled rendering based on the published article under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 5. Diagrams of sequence types 1 to 20 of the origin of the ascending pharyngeal artery from the external carotid artery, with prevalences.
Figure 5. Diagrams of sequence types 1–20 of the origin of the ascending pharyngeal artery from the external carotid artery, with their prevalences. Locally bundled rendering based on the published article under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 6. Diagrams of sequence types 21 to 40 of the origin of the ascending pharyngeal artery from the external carotid artery, with prevalences.
Figure 6. Diagrams of sequence types 21–40 of the origin of the ascending pharyngeal artery from the external carotid artery, with their prevalences. Locally bundled rendering based on the published article under CC BY 4.0.
05 · Why the S-types matter

The origin type and the branching sequence answer different questions

The origin type tells where the APA starts. The S-type sequence tells in what order the ECA branches actually emerge, which is the more operational classification during surgical or endovascular planning.

40

S-types

Complete sequential ECA branching patterns were catalogued.

23

Rare S-types

Twenty-three patterns occurred in fewer than five carotid axes each.

19.41%

S0

Types 0 and IV are grouped as S0 because the APA is absent from the ECA branching sequence.