Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy · 2026

Anatomical Variability of the Lingual Artery

A comprehensive narrative review of lingual-artery anatomy that combines classic landmarks, common trunk variants, dynamic tongue-related topography, and critical discussion of inconsistencies across the literature.

Dincă V · Calotă RN · Hostiuc S · Tudose RC · Varga I · Rusu MC · doi: 10.1007/s00276-026-03846-6

This microsite condenses the paper into interactive reading paths. Use the buttons below to switch between anatomical logic, key findings, and practical implications.

Origin & trunks

Origin is usually standard, but common trunks are not rare

The lingual artery typically arises from the ECA near the greater horn of the hyoid, yet common trunks are a routine part of its variability.

Linguofacial trunk

The most frequent variant, reported in roughly 16–25% of individuals.

Thyrolingual trunk

Less common, usually around 0.3–3.3%.

Thyrolinguofacial trunk

An uncommon but established composite trunk, approximately 1%.

Take-home point: The artery is usually present where expected, but its mode of origin is far from uniform.

Origin spectrum

Typical patternIndependent ECA origin near the greater horn of the hyoid.
Linguofacial trunkLingual and facial arteries arise together.
Thyrolingual / thyrolinguofacialComposite trunks alter proximal branching expectations.
  • The review emphasises that knowing common trunk patterns prevents avoidable bleeding surprises.
  • Variant origins matter in both open surgery and endovascular work.
  • Origin variation is best interpreted alongside deeper course and landmarks.
Landmarks

The hypoglossal nerve and hyoid remain the most useful guides

Among the numerous landmarks proposed in the literature, the greater horn of the hyoid and the hypoglossal nerve emerge as the most consistently useful.

Hypoglossal relation

The LA lies inferior to or contacts the hypoglossal nerve in approximately 85% of cases.

Deep course

The artery usually runs deep to the hyoglossus, which remains the key surgical barrier.

Seki framework

Trajectory relative to the hyoglossus helps organise course variations.

Take-home point: Use a landmark pair—hyoid plus hypoglossal nerve—rather than a single-point mental model.

Landmark logic

Greater horn of hyoidUseful external–deep topographic anchor.
Hypoglossal nerveReliable guide to the artery in most dissections.
HyoglossusDeep muscular curtain separating safer from riskier planes.
  • No single landmark is perfect, but these two remain the most dependable.
  • The review also calls attention to inconsistent or numerically discordant classic reports.
  • It is therefore a practical anatomy paper and a literature audit at once.
Dynamic topography

Tongue manipulation changes the safety corridor

One of the review’s most clinically relevant messages is dynamic: extension and retraction bring the lingual arteries closer to the mucosal surface and closer to each other.

Depth change

CTA data suggest tongue extension reduces LA depth at the foramen cecum level by about 4 mm.

Midline narrowing

Bilateral distance may decrease by roughly 6 mm with tongue extension.

Clinical implication

Transoral surgery and haemostasis planning should assume a moving, not fixed, lingual vasculature.

Take-home point: The lingual artery should be planned as a dynamic surgical neighbour, not a fixed one.

Dynamic safety corridor

Neutral tongueDeeper arteries and wider midline separation.
Extended/retracted tongueArteries shift superficially and closer together.
Operative consequenceThe midline safety corridor becomes narrower than static anatomy suggests.
  • The review links morphology directly to transoral technique.
  • Dynamic topography is a major reason why textbook static distances can mislead in theatre.
  • A vessel-safe corridor can shrink during the manoeuvre that creates exposure.