Narrative reviewSurgical and Radiologic Anatomy2026CC BY 4.0

The persistent proatlantal artery: types and subtypes

A nomenclature-focused review of the rare persistent proatlantal artery, arguing that classification should be driven primarily by cervical course and C1 transverse-foramen relationship rather than by arterial origin alone.

Mugurel Constantin Rusu · Răzvan Costin Tudose · Alexandra Diana Vrapciu
The classification problem

Origin alone is insufficient.

The traditional “Type I = ICA / Type II = ECA” shorthand breaks down in hybrid cases. A course-forward approach—especially whether the channel traverses the C1 transverse foramen—better separates canonical Type I, Type II spinal, and Type II occipital/mixed configurations.

~0.01%reported incidence in a multislice CTA cohort
01 · Type explorer

Course first, origin second

Select a configuration to compare origin, course, transverse-foramen relationship, vertebral-artery connection, and occipital-artery behaviour.

02 · Two-axis concept

Separate origin from course

The review proposes a harmonised reading of the literature by documenting both the carotid-system origin and the actual cervical pathway.

Carotid-system originICAECA / occipital systemCCACourseC1 transverse foramen bypassedType I-like suboccipital sweep · foramen magnum entryC1 transverse foramen traversedType II “spinal” pathway · joins V3The same origin can feed different course patterns; the course resolves the classification.
03 · Reporting algorithm

Four descriptors reduce ambiguity

The paper recommends a standardised report rather than a one-word label.

1

Origin

ICA, ECA / occipital system, or CCA.

2

C1 transverse foramen

Traversed or bypassed.

3

Occipital artery

Record incorporation, shared trunk, or branch origin.

4

VA / posterior supply

Document ipsilateral VA status and whether posterior circulation depends on the PPA.

04 · Index case

An ECA-origin Type II, occipital subtype

The illustrative CTA case demonstrates exactly why origin-only naming fails.

73

Patient age

A 73-year-old woman.

ECA

Origin

The PPA arose from the posterior aspect of the left external carotid artery opposite C2/C3.

No C1 TF

Course

It bypassed the C1 transverse foramen, gave rise to the occipital artery, continued as V3, and entered via the foramen magnum.

Interpretation: ECA origin suggests Type II, but the Type I-like suboccipital course makes this Cohen’s Type II “occipital” subtype / mixed configuration.
05 · Clinical significance

Why recognition matters before intervention

A PPA may be a minor collateral or the dominant posterior-fossa supply.

ECA ligation / embolisation

Potentially dangerous when an ECA-derived PPA contributes substantially to the posterior circulation.

Carotid endarterectomy

Carotid flow manipulation may endanger posterior circulation when the PPA is dominant.

CVJ / skull-base surgery

Suboccipital and C1-related variants can lie directly in operative corridors.

Endovascular access

The PPA can occasionally serve as the only feasible route to posterior circulation lesions.

Diagnostic pitfall: do not confuse a PPA with a persistent hypoglossal artery. Foramen-magnum entry and the extracranial formation of the vertebral artery favour PPA.