Systematic review + meta-analysisClinical Anatomy2026Subscription publication

The retropharyngeal internal carotid artery

A pooled and topographic synthesis of a clinically important cervical ICA variant in which the artery approaches or abuts the pharyngeal wall, narrowing the safety margin for airway, transoral, cervical, and spine procedures.

Răzvan Costin Tudose · Andrei Darius Stan · Alexandra Diana Vrapciu · Ionuț Mădălin Munteanu · Cătălin Constantin Dumitru · George Triantafyllou · Maria Piagkou · Mugurel Constantin Rusu
Pooled estimate

RP-ICA is uncommon, but the procedural consequence can be major.

Five imaging cohorts contributed 150 cases among 10,066 adults. The pooled prevalence was 1.51%, but heterogeneity was substantial because definitions, modalities, and eras differed.

1.51%pooled prevalence · 95% CI 0.53–4.21%
01 · Meta-analysis

Five cohorts, very different estimates

The study-specific prevalence ranged from 0.07% to 7.97%, producing substantial heterogeneity.

10,066

Adults pooled

Patient-level denominator across five imaging cohorts.

150

RP-ICA cases

Patient-level numerator used in the meta-analysis.

96.6%

I²

Marked heterogeneity across cohorts.

0.07–7.97%

Study range

Definitions and imaging strategies strongly influenced estimates.

Primary analysis
1.51%
Exclude older CT
2.90%
Exclude newer CT
0.99%
CTA + MRI only
2.11%
02 · Safety margin

The clinically meaningful variable is distance to the pharyngeal wall

RP-ICA is most often described at the oropharynx. The artery may lie only a few millimetres from the mucosa or even contact it.

Posterior pharyngeal wallICAcarotid–pharyngeal distance (CPD)Smaller CPD→ narrower procedural safety margin
Important: different studies measured “carotid–pharyngeal distance” differently. The review recommends the global minimum linear distance from the ICA outer wall to the pharyngeal mucosa, with level and laterality reported explicitly.
03 · Topography

Oropharyngeal predominance, but the spectrum is broader

The review places RP-ICA within a broader retropharyngeal carotid spectrum that can also involve the CCA and, less often, the ECA.

Nasopharynx

Medialised carotids can approach the torus tubarius, pharyngeal recess, and posterior nasopharyngeal wall.

Oropharynx

The most frequently reported RP-ICA level and the key corridor for tonsillar and transoral risk.

Laryngopharynx

Medialised carotid segments can extend inferiorly and interact with hyoid-related and cervical-spine anatomy.

04 · Dynamic anatomy

The carotid position may change over time

Serial imaging studies showed that retropharyngeal carotid position is not always fixed, which limits the value of remote pre-procedural imaging.

6.3%

Positional change

One serial-imaging cohort documented carotid position change between studies.

5.63 mm

Original case 1

Unilateral right retrotonsillar RP-ICA at C2–C3.

3.63 mm

Original case 2 · left

Bilateral RP-ICA; right CPD 6.26 mm and left CPD 3.63 mm.

Practical implication: when prior imaging shows borderline carotid proximity, updated imaging close to the planned procedure may be prudent.
05 · Procedural risk

Where this anatomy matters most

A near-mucosal or submucosal ICA can turn routine procedures into vascular-risk procedures.

Airway management

Nasotracheal intubation and traumatic pharyngeal instrumentation can endanger a medially displaced ICA.

ENT / transoral surgery

Tonsillectomy, transoral robotic surgery, and related procedures require awareness of a reduced mucosal safety margin.

Spine surgery

Medialised carotids may enter anterior cervical operative corridors.

Dentistry / maxillofacial care

Cross-sectional imaging can reveal hazardous carotid proximity relevant to deep pharyngeal procedures and injections.